Bravo's version of reality TV hits on a formula that's like crack to me: take a topic that's of vague interest to women, gay men, and hipsters in general, find someone who's made a capital-N Name for him or herself in the field, find someone else who likewise crawled to the top, through her amply-on-display-bitchiness, rotate in a few celebrity guest-judges, either from the world in question or the world at large, and top it off with a hot hostess who has some tangential connection with the proceedings.
The one place this fails for me is Top Chef. There, the hostess is a supermodel-stunner, Padma Lakshmi. Yes, I like Padma - she married Salman Rushdie, after all - but I have a hard time believing she eats enough foie gras to weigh in on it with any degree of expertise.
Still, with Padma, I was willing to give some leeway - after all, the lady's all curves, a sure sign that she probably eats SOMETHING on occasion, in stark contrast to the majority of her fellow-models.
Kelly Choi, however, hostess of "Top Chef: Masters," is another story.
The woman is so thin that she looks like a bobble-head. I bet I could fit my hands around her ribcage twice. Her body type reminds me of the South Park episode where they draw starving Africans.
This immediately places her credentials in question, a much bigger problem since this is the self-titled "Masters" version of the show, (read: the version where every single contestant is a world-class chef) where the judges should be, if anything, more discerning. The original Top Chef is like a competition amongst grad students. On "Masters," it's about choosing between food Einsteins and food Stephen Hawkings; doing so requires more than a working knowledge of physics, if you know what I'm saying.
I get that they need eye-candy, but if that's all the hostess was supposed to be, they could have done WAY better. Sure, I don't buy that Cindy Crawford would qualify as an expert on all-things-edible, either, but it would be a LOT more fun (and a lot less like witnessing the moment of first-contact) watching her do it.
-Posted by Jilly
The Truth About This Special Time In Your Life
According to what we remember from pamphlets geared towards 6th-grade girls, puberty is regarded as one of the most awkward and scary stages in a person’s life. It’s a time of horrifying physical transformations, scary new feelings, and growing interest in activities that you are still not old enough to engage in legally. Common symptoms of puberty include: braces, frizzy hair, baby fat, having a crush on 8th grader Steve Julius, blinding body odor and lame extracurricular interests like the violin or Bedazzling.
However, if personal experience has taught us anything, it's that there are experiences in life far more awkward, scary and pathetic than puberty. Here is a list of things that are:
WORSE THAN PUBERTY
However, if personal experience has taught us anything, it's that there are experiences in life far more awkward, scary and pathetic than puberty. Here is a list of things that are:
WORSE THAN PUBERTY
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment